Re: mutt_free_header -> free -> mutt_sort_headers -> segfault
>Mh. I can't reproduce the first thing without efence; looks like I
neither can I.
>have to install that. The second segfault, though, looks like it
>should be reproducible without (NULL pointer deference), and I don't
>get that one, either.
>
>Can you confirm whether the second problem is reproducible without
>efence? Also, what optimization settings
yes.
---Mutt: mutttest/
[Msgs:0]---(threads/date)-------------------------------------------(all)---
Sorting mailbox...Segmentation fault
/tmp $
>are you using?
gcc -march=pentiumpro -O0 -fverbose-asm -fno-omit-frame-pointer -ggdb3