<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: mutt_free_header -> free -> mutt_sort_headers -> segfault



>Mh. I can't reproduce the first thing without efence; looks like I

neither can I.

>have to install that. The second segfault, though, looks like it
>should be reproducible without (NULL pointer deference), and I don't
>get that one, either.
>
>Can you confirm whether the second problem is reproducible without
>efence? Also, what optimization settings 

yes.

---Mutt: mutttest/ 
[Msgs:0]---(threads/date)-------------------------------------------(all)---
Sorting mailbox...Segmentation fault                                            
               
/tmp $

>are you using?

gcc -march=pentiumpro -O0 -fverbose-asm -fno-omit-frame-pointer -ggdb3