<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: bug#1660: Repyling with extended charactors in the From:



... and could fix it by installing the glibc-locale package.

On 2003-10-09 13:11:40 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Andrew Lunn <andrew.lunn@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: 1660@xxxxxxxxxxxx, Mutt dev ml <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 13:11:40 +0200
> Subject: Re: bug#1660: Repyling with extended charactors in the From:
> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Lunn <andrew.lunn@xxxxxxxx>, 1660@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
>       Mutt dev ml <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>
> X-Spam-Level: 
> 
> FWIW, I'm observing the same problems on a SuSE 8.1 machine myself,
> but couldn't track it down so far.  No problems with the Debian or
> RedHat installations I normally use.
> 
> Interestingly, on the SuSE machine my editor (jed) also has problems
> with Umlauts, which makes me suspect that this is some configuration
> problem, and *not* a mutt bug.
> 
> -- 
> Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 2003-10-08 11:07:56 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > From: Andrew Lunn <andrew.lunn@xxxxxxxx>
> > To: 1660@xxxxxxxxxxxx, Mutt dev ml <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>,
> >     Andrew Lunn <andrew.lunn@xxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 11:07:56 +0200
> > Subject: Re: bug#1660: Repyling with extended charactors in the From:
> > X-Spam-Level: 
> > 
> > On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:42:56AM +0200, Alain Bench wrote:
> > >     [CC and MFT mutt-dev mailing list]
> > > 
> > > Hello Andrew, thanks for your report.
> > > 
> > >  On Tuesday, October 7, 2003 at 4:45:43 PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Package: Mutt=20
> > > > Version: 1.5.4i
> > > >
> > > > I have the following email header:
> > > >
> > > > Subject: Re: [ECOS] Stress testing JFFS2
> > > > From: \330yvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > Note that \330 is actually a Ö. Its a Scandinavian name.
> > > >
> > > > When i try to reply to this, either group or normal reply, mutt always
> > > > gives me a blank To: prompt instead of giving putting the email there
> > > > as it normally does. The extended character is confusing mutt.
> > > 
> > >     I full quote you because your bug report was not auto-forwarded to
> > > mutt-dev, perhaps due to the mangled =20 package name. Interested people
> > > can look at <URL:http://bugs.guug.de/db/16/1660.html>.
> > > 
> > > 
> > >     Let me try a guess: You have an UTF-8 terminal, a correctly set
> > > system locale, the given char is Ø (stroked O), and the 0xD8 byte is raw
> > > in header, unencoded. Right?
> > 
> > The Ø is not raw in the header. Here is the header direct from
> > /var/mail/lunn.
> > 
> > Received: from mail.broadpark.no ([217.13.4.2])
> >         by londo.lunn.ch with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
> >         id 1A6sgV-0004CN-00
> >         for <andrew@xxxxxxx>; Tue, 07 Oct 2003 16:19:31 +0200
> > Received: from famine (217-13-20-38.dd.nextgentel.com [217.13.20.38])
> >         by mail.broadpark.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C1678C34
> >         for <andrew@xxxxxxx>; Tue,  7 Oct 2003 16:18:59 +0200 (MEST)
> > Subject: Re: [ECOS] Stress testing JFFS2
> > From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D8yvind?= Harboe <oyvind.harboe@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
> > In-Reply-To: <20031007141018.GD15932@xxxxxxx>
> > References: <1065524219.5485.43.camel@famine>
> >          <20031007130402.GB15932@xxxxxxx> <1065532608.5999.8.camel@famine>
> >          <20031007134301.GC15932@xxxxxxx> <1065534644.5999.22.camel@famine>
> >          <20031007141018.GD15932@xxxxxxx>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> > Organization: Zylin AS
> > Message-Id: <1065536338.6193.7.camel@famine>
> > Mime-Version: 1.0
> > X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 
> > Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 16:18:59 +0200
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> > Status: RO
> > X-Status: A
> > Content-Length: 1193
> > Lines: 29
> > 
> > Is the From: line correctly encoded? I don't know what RFC 2047 says.
> > 
> > >     Otherwise, if I guessed wrong, please provide us complete context
> > > informations about your setup: OS, versions, iconv, terminal, charset,
> > > locale, usw... So we can investigate.
> > 
> > Debian-Testing. 
> > iconv (GNU libc) 2.3.2
> > xterm XFree86 4.2.0(165), or xterm on SunOS 5.5. Both have the same problem.
> > charset locale etc are standard defaults for Debian. Nothing special.
> > 
> >         Thanks
> >                 Andrew
> > 
> 

-- 
Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.