Re: bug tracking system

To: Aaron Lehmann <aaronl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: bug tracking system
From: Werner Koch <wk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 13:39:47 +0200
Cc: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030904203949.GK2325@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Thomas Roessler's message of "Thu, 4 Sep 2003 22:39:49 +0200")
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: Aaron Lehmann <aaronl@xxxxxxxxxxx>, mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
Organisation: g10 Code GmbH
References: <20030904153237.GI2325@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030904174540.GQ2743@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20030904203949.GK2325@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/20.7 (gnu/linux)

On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 22:39:49 +0200, Thomas Roessler said:

> The downside to this is that spamassassin isn't the fastest program
> on earth, so this process might take a couple of days before it
> finishes.

And that is the reason why we can't use it on that machine.

It would be far easier and faster if we could pass the input through
procmail or another script.

-- 
Werner Koch                                      <wk@xxxxxxxxx>
The GnuPG Experts                                http://g10code.com
Free Software Foundation Europe                  http://fsfeurope.org

References:
- bug tracking system
  - From: Thomas Roessler
- Re: bug tracking system
  - From: Aaron Lehmann
- Re: bug tracking system
  - From: Thomas Roessler

Prev by Date: Some bugs restored.
Next by Date: Re: Small patch for saving attachments: last used folder can be recalled
Previous by thread: Re: bug tracking system
Next by thread: more about the BTS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread