Re: [Debate] "Offene Standards": Koalition beharrt auf Umdefinition
Am 22.06.07 schrieb Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Ich weiß nicht, wie weit die Forderungen gehen. Wäre das folgende
> ausreichend?
>
> | In addition, for the Eifel submission, if said submission is included
> | in an IETF standard and Ericsson has patents that are essential to the
> | implementation of such included submission in said standard, Ericsson
> | is prepared to grant - on the basis of reciprocity -a paid up,
> | nonexclusive, royalty free license on such patents for the purpose of
> | implementing said standard, if and only if practiced under any
> | software distributed under the present terms of the GNU GENERAL PUBLIC
> | LICENSE (http://www.fsf.org/copyleft/gpl.html) or practiced under any
> | operating system software in which all major components of the
> | operating system - including the kernel, device drivers and libraries
> | necessary to run a program - are distributed under the terms of a
> | license that conforms to the present OPEN SOURCE DEFINITION
> | (http://www.opensource.org/osd.html).
Nein. BSD kann damit nichts anfangen.
Gruß
Martin
_______________________________________________
Debate mailing list
Debate@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fitug.de:8080/mailman/listinfo/debate