Re: Different encodings at index and pager views
- To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Different encodings at index and pager views
- From: Carlos Pita <carlosjosepita@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:07:40 -0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=5z/hkQO9Lfpel655mGib5fqZcFKDMsaiNhJcUiSoGt8=; b=xsrXbSVX3YBQddij/fKVmpyn4T4AAGEPt8AV4ne7oPSCFPBLbsA1l1aGRJYlCA/cS0 EeUuoygTMEjuLCSx05DL+lPMhZPI6bSL4NK0Yln0ChfL85ks3a++Dc733ipIe2FjgTAn yQz627n1xzgjRhH8fxlZ/t0gaKzJkiNFsQ9Nc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=T8Mokz1bukPeMktsIUl/Rtp1qwNe6y7lzXVZiwPZUm9SxGqYzvK3Cln88ou7TmdUIm 9kMC0gizaEQ26zw5u+yxY83nH39HhICP40yktWrifsMzx1dvs+VQF6cXfsfdh+N/Jo9p IllEM/qaeERzgvrFPCbXorarW+ly5PUvKIdWk=
- In-reply-to: <20090227035008.GA3685@carlos>
- List-post: <mailto:mutt-users@mutt.org>
- List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users"
- References: <20090226220720.GA12471@carlos> <20090226235000.GA25725@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090227035008.GA3685@carlos>
- Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
boundary="===============3754908945113369111=="
From: "Livra Encuestas" <noresponda@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: ?Opin? sobre Bebidas Alcoh?licas y gan? una TV LCD o una Notebook!
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:37:05 -0600
To: carlosjosepita@xxxxxxxxx
Message-Id: <20090226183705.6152E1AF0DCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Yeah, you're right, they're poorly reencoding at some point.
Why would they do that? Does IMAP impose any restriction on the encoding?
OTOH, they serve the entire mail in its original encoding and so they show
it at their site.
Thanks for the debugging tips!
Best regards
-Carlos
>