Re: definition of signature separator
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:51:31PM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> For one thing, the fact that it's never become a standardized format,
> and is instead a mix-and-match set of conventions that every mail
> program has their own ideas about (often with disastrous results). I
> find that hilarious. And the fact that people continue to refer to
> "mbox" as a mailbox format, and continue to use it as if it were a
> portable useful format... As far as I can tell, it's good for one
> thing: mail that will only ever be accessed by a single piece of
> software.
>
No different from other formats such as maildir then! :-)
--
Chris Green