Re: Mixmaster
* Brian Salter-Duke <b_duke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [06.12.07 21:31]:
> Is anyone using the mixmaster support in mutt? I ask merely because I
> was involved in improving this about 7 years ago, and I'm curious. I have
> no intention of ever using it again. The support is for a very old
> version of Mixmaster and not for the more recent version 3 betas.
>
> Should Mixmaster support be kept? It is unlikely to carry on working
> even with the old mixmaster code (version 2.4 beta 46 from September
> 2002), and that code may soon be not available.
>
> Brian.
* Ciò letto, correndo giovedì 06 dicembre 2007, alle 21 e 38 rispondo così:
Last Mixmaster changes are dated 2007 september, see:
http://svn.noreply.org/svn/mixmaster/trunk/Mix/HISTORY
I would like to use mixmaster support, yes.
I wrote also a complete reference guide* for using mixmaster with Mutt,
but it's kept in stand-by, because of incompatibility between
recent versions of Mutt and Mixmaster.
It's an ideal argument for a flame war... anonimity: good or bad?
IMHO it's good in some situations.
In the country where I live, others are the instruments to protect
yourself from abuse, crimes, ecc.. So I like Mixmaster as matter of
study, in some sense.
In other countries, perhaps, anonimity could be matter of life.
* in italian and as a part of "Il Nirvana con Mutt" (see website in sig).
ciao Ataualpa aka Francesco Ciattaglia.
--
- Linux is better: Open & Free! || www.ataualpa.altervista.org