Re: list reply to mailing list (without Reply-To munging)

[Kyle Wheeler <kyle-mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday, August 14 at 10:12 PM, quoth Hein Zelle:
> for those of us with retarded finger-memory that can't seem to get 
> used to using "L" for list-reply, is it possible to make this an 
> automatic action?

Of course!

> I've seen people configuring it with a folder hook and ~l, but I 
> tend to read my email while still in the inbox.  I thought about 
> using a send-hook instead, but that's probably too late.

Using ~l patterns in message-hooks is what I use; that way the 
rebinding happens as I view the message. If I reply to things from 
index view, it doesn't help, but I don't generally reply to messages 
without viewing them first, so this isn't a significant annoyance.

Here's what I use:

message-hook .  'bind pager l list-reply; bind pager r reply'
message-hook ~l 'bind pager l reply; bind pager r list-reply'

> Is it possible to make 'r' behave like 'L' for subscribed lists that 
> don't set the Reply-To header to the list address, or perhaps to make mutt 
> ask if I want to reply to the list?

Not (that I've found) while looking at the message from the index. But 
the hooks I use are quite acceptable to me. Maybe that'll be 
sufficient for you too?

~Kyle
- -- 
Carpe per diem---seize the check.
                                                      -- Robin Williams
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Thank you for using encryption!

iD8DBQFGwg8QBkIOoMqOI14RAuwoAKC0C65MJz1EDyABcTdTtKo3gIAS5gCdFGxB
lEAjcUjYS26S/Yqq6t1xotg=
=+mVm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----