Re: Mutt or muttng?
=- Eyolf Oestrem wrote on Wed 27.Jun'07 at 22:22:39 +0200 -=
> a designated trash folder,
> a reminder for forgotten attachments;
There are macro solutions on the wiki.
> an option to reply to the list and not the original sender;
use "lists" + "subscribe" with list-reply for lists, set reply-to
and mailfollowup-to to interactively ask you whether to use those or
not (to reply to sender in From).
> a max line length
Not sure what this is, but "fmt" and shell wrappers or
external editor config certainly can do whatever it is.
> And, perhaps more importantly: are there good reasons why I should
> use mutt and not muttng?
You should better ask muttng folks why you should use it.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.