Re: no fcc with command-line sending, but with -i asks for PW
=- Greg Novack wrote on Fri 30.Mar'07 at 3:50:31 -0500 -=
> Lo, if I do it using
> -i messagebody.txt
> instead of with
> < messagebody.txt
> then it gets FCC'd, and even has my signature appended (which
> does not happen with the method that won't FCC either).
>
> Come to think of it, this has spawned another question. When I
> use '<' instead of '-i', I am not even prompted for a password,
> which I assume is because mutt doesn't need me to interact with
> msmtp. But when I use '-i', Mutt *does* prompt me for my
> password (IMAP), even though msmtp doesn't need it, and even
> though I am not checking my inbox. What's up with this?
I guess your fcc-folder is on IMAP?!
If '<' doesn't do any fcc'ing, then, of course, you won't be asked.
If '-i' OTOH does, then it can't save fcc without your IMAP-PW.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.