Re: pgp issue
Set $pgp_verify_sig to "no".
Verifying signatures without looking at the resulting
information isn't a very useful thing to do.
On 2006-06-30 16:03:57 +0800, Shaochun Wang wrote:
> From: Shaochun Wang <scwang@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:03:57 +0800
> Subject: pgp issue
> X-Spam-Level:
>
> Recently, I struggled to use gnupg in mutt.
> Now, everything seems ok but the output of
> gnupg is boring as following:
>
> [-- PGP output follows (current time: Fri Jun 30 15:57:23 2006) --]
> gpg: Signature made Tue Apr 25 12:13:01 2006 CST using DSA key ID 87ED9963
> gpg: Good signature from "James Vasile (Personal Key) <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>"
> gpg: aka "Gonzo <gonzo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>"
> gpg: aka "James Vasile (backup email rarely checked)
> +<jvasile@xxxxxxxxx>"
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
> Primary key fingerprint: E8B0 8163 C9DF 6C91 4567 895C 090F 1B45 87ED 9963
> [-- End of PGP output --]
>
> I dislike this information produced by gnupg. Is there any way to
> illiminate it?
>
>
> --
> Shaochun Wang <scwang@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> GPG Fingerprint: 70C2 6945 0E46 E08B 419A 007C AC5C F21F 358A 0833
> You can get my publickey from the following url:
> http://lcs.ios.ac.cn/~scwang/docs/scwangpublickey.gpg
>
>
--
Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.