* Kyle Wheeler <kyle-mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This seems both obvious, and intuititve. Why does your mutt say > something different? Hmmm... Because I'm not using English as default language and am not a native English speaker either - it may very well be a translation / synonym issue. The mutt-induced message on checking your post's sig translates to "PGP signature could NOT be verified." which is ok with me (I know that either the sig itself is faulty or the necessary pubkey is missing). However, I have been using my mutt-gpg setup for ages (early 1.5.x) and have had thus far no reason to fumble with it. Maybe that's what causes the confusion; I just like a working config. If it helps consider my post nonexistent. -- left blank, right bald let's rename the endangered species!
Attachment:
pgp29xaZQC27b.pgp
Description: PGP signature