Re: Poll: personal convenience vs. global improvement of docs
On 20:54 Wed 24 May 2006, Derek Martin wrote:
> Some ways mutt is lacking:
> - built-in configuration tools: Mutt is a pain to configure, even
> for seasoned mutt users. Built-in tools would aid greatly in
> making mutt more user-friendly.
Agree. But it shouldn't be some 'ok to have but ok to forget' cofig tool. It
should be something that people really love to use (how many guys are
manually editing kernel config files?).
> Oh and before someone says, "shut up and write the code..." as someone
> inevitably will:
I can't code. But I can join in the discussion.
> It's a big project. I couldn't possibly do it alone, even if I wanted
> to. To be done right and well, it needs organization and planning: a
> road map. And it needs a leader
Indeed. Linux Kernel is a good example.
phyrster