Re: Mark messages in mailbox as read without massive performance hit?!
* Derek Martin <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2005-12-29 05:11 -0500]:
> It seems like you're using a filesystem that's optimized for this
> case. One of the reasons header cache was added into mutt was because
> opening large maildir folders on traditional Unix filesystems
> (including ext2) was catastrophically slower than mbox. These numbers
> don't seem to reflect that, which makes me think you're using one of
> the *BSDs or Reiserfs or another optimized filesystem. Yes?
It's FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p11.
But have you tried it with Linux?
Nicolas
--
http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas