* Charles Cazabon <mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2005-10-06 14:13 -0600]: > The user replied in private mail that this fixed the problem, but I'm > confused: shouldn't a bare, value-less "set varname" be an error if the > variable is a quadoption? I tested this in 1.5.6, and it is silently ignored. It's an boolean here (1.5.11). And 'set <somequadoption>' seems to be equivalent to 'set <somequadoption>=yes'. Nicolas -- http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas