Re: Using send-hook to remove a header
On Thursday, September 1, 2005 at 8:48:35 AM +0200, Alain Bench wrote:
> On Friday, August 26, 2005 at 12:53:40 PM +0200, Alain Bench wrote:
>> the ~l pattern for "message is addressed to a known mailing list"?
>> But note the <F1> lies: It matches *only* subscribed lists.
> a bug in code that should be corrected to match documentation and to
> match all known lists.
Thanks to Brendan, my patch was accepted to CVS on last Friday,
together with another one (see <URL:http://bugs.mutt.org/2050>). Thus
from next release (1.5.11?) Mutt will have:
· ~l matches all known _l_ists, subscribed or not.
· ~u matches s_u_bscribed lists only.
· ~l!~u matches not subscribed lists only.
~u will be a new pattern, retaining old behaviour of ~l. And ~l will
change its meaning. People relying on old (mis)behaviour of ~l matching
only subscribed lists should prepare to review their muttrcs, sorry.
As always, the muttrc command:
| lists ^mutt-users@mutt\\.org$
...declares the said address to be a known mailing list, while:
| subscribe ^mutt-users@mutt\\.org$
...declares it to be a subscribed *and* known (obviously) list.
Bye! Alain.
--
When you want to reply to a mailing list, please avoid doing so with
NetCourrier Webmail. This lacks necessary references and breaks threads.