Re: *> in threads
Hi,
how about '=>'
where do I find out about these "notations" generally,
thanks,
Luke
06Nov2004 @ 03:25 Adeodato Simó thusly spake
> * Kyle Wheeler [Fri, 05 Nov 2004 01:05:18 -0500]:
> > On Friday, November 5 at 03:24 PM, quoth luke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> > > Hi,
>
> > > Some individual messages in threads show '*>' while others show '>' when
> > > pointing to a message.
> > > What does it mean?
>
> > It means that mutt couldn't figure out exactly where that particular
> > message was supposed to go in the thread, and mutt made it's best guess.
>
> which, in case it isn't clear enough, only happens for mails which
> don't carry the appropriate In-Reply-To or References headers. in that
> case, "thread by subject" happens (which can be disabled by setting
> $strict_threads).
>
> happy mutt'ing,
>
> --
> Adeodato Simó
> EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
>
> Capitalism is the extraordinary belief that the nastiest of men, for the
> nastiest of reasons, will somehow work for the benefit of us all.
> -- John Maynard Keynes
>
--
/ / _
/_ /_/ /< /=
0421 276 282