<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: from & to fields



2004-08-08 12:28, mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote in 
<20040808102839.GC1030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> The naive variant would be:
>> yoo@vranx\.de|yooden@vranx\.de|.+@thorstenhau\.de

Of course one could most likely also use:

yoo(den)?@vranx\.de|.+@thorstenhau\.de

I do that in my .procmailrc all the time...


> I tried with both
>     set alternates=(yoo@vranx\.de|yooden@vranx\.de|.+@thorstenhau\.de)
> Result: alternates="(yoo@xxxxxxxx|yooden@xxxxxxxx|.+@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)"
> and
>     set alternates=(yoo@vranx\\.de|yooden@vranx\\.de|.+@thorstenhau\\.de)
> Result: alternates="(yoo@vranx\.de|yooden@vranx\.de|.+@thorstenhau\.de)"

Here is what I've got in my .muttrc:

set reverse_name=yes
alternates email@xxxxxxxxxxx email@xxxxxxxxxxx ...

(Yes, I have a lot of other things too, but this is what seems to be
of relevance in this case.)

Works fine for me. Mutt 1.5.6 from CVS maybe two weeks ago.

-- 
/"\ Michael Kjörling - michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx - SM0YBY QTH JO89XI  ^..^
\ / OpenPGP: 3723 9372 c245 d6a8 18a6 36ac 758f 8749  BDE9 ADA6   \/
 X  World Wide Web: http://michael.kjorling.com/      Facta non verba
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: Against HTML Mail, Proprietary Attachments

Attachment: pgpCnvupR54B3.pgp
Description: PGP signature