On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 12:02:19PM -0400, Todd wrote: > Andre Bonhote wrote: > > Anyone uses a newer patch? Currently, I have 1.4.1 installed and I > > wouldn't mind to update to a more recent version. > > Take a look at Dale Woolridge's patch[1]. It enables mutt 1.4 to send > traditional pgp sigs using a text/plain content-type instead of the > application/pgp content-type. The pgp menu patch adds some text to > the pgp menu making it clear when you're sending PGP/MIME or inline > style messages. Ok. > Alternatively, you could use mutt 1.5 which uses text/plain for > traditional (inline) pgp/gpg messages by default. Eh? Why this? I mean, isn't text/plain evil? > [1] http://www.woolridge.org/mutt/ (note: his site wasn't working just > now when I tried it, I hope that's only temporary.) Thanks & Cheers A. -- > YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK > FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU !!!!!!!!!!!!!! Someone who does wallpaper designs for bordellos, apparently. (Jess Anderson on spamassassin-talk to charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Attachment:
pgpgDJnPHjwKc.pgp
Description: PGP signature