On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:08:04AM EST, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Vincent Lefevre in <20040309111008.GS16556@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > It's also worth noting that if you simply use the x-label header to hold > > > information for pattern matches, you can construct an x-label like this > > > instead (assuming your terminal is about 80 chars wide), and avoid having > > > to touch the source: > > > > > > X-Label: somebody (5K) some boring subject > > > |+|-+-|+| some_tag_to_match some_other_tag_to_match > > > > But I don't think that one can grep the X-Label contents to put > > partial information in the index (like a score). > > I think David wanted to suggest that /if/ you are currently using > X-Label for tagging messages (rather than displaying its contents in the > index), you could use the first N columns of it to be displayed > (%20.20y), and the remainder for tags. Otherwise, you loose, especially > with %Y (in contrast to %y). Thanks for clarifying my Daveglish [1] ;-) > Patching mutt to recognize "X-Label-2:" headers shouldn't be too hard; a > generic mechanism to handle this stuff would be nice, though. Yeah, I was kinda hoping somebody would propose this :-) - Dave [1] http://www.bigfatdave.com/me/glossary.html -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpuo0kBUKcVQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature