Re: [OT] Assorted Fun (was: Re: imap issues)
* David Yitzchak Cohen <lists+mutt_users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2004-02-24 12:28]
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 01:39:06AM EST, Colin J. Raven wrote:
> > * David Yitzchak Cohen <lists+mutt_users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2004-02-24 06:49]
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 06:32:20PM EST, Colin J. Raven wrote:
>
> > Thanks for an enormously detailed and helpful response! I couldn't have
> > asked for better!!! (I guess I should have written "potentially helpful"
> > to be boringly pedantic, because I'm going to have to read, re-read and
> > inwardly digest the contents of your post)
[SNIPPAGE]
> > Well, sorry for the excessive bandwidth, but thanks to the list for
> > guidance and support. It's good to know it's there, and hopefully I can
> > contribute as my own knowledge grows, ths maintaining the essential
> > "balance".
>
> Yeah :-)
>
> A good rule of thumb is to strive for at least a few [OT] posts for
> each non-[OT] one. Flagging OT messages as OT is a good idea, though,
> since some grumpy gramps here start to grumble a little (just a teensy
> weensy wittle bit) when they see OT stuff not clearly marked as such.
ECtoowalleeeeee, I think it was really ON-Topic since it (inadvertently)
evangelized Mutt more than just a little. :-)
> - Dave [who thinks you need to fix your MFT header]
<baffled look>
WTH is an MFT header, and how would I fix it?
</baffled look>