On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 09:21:00PM -0500, David Yitzchak Cohen wrote: > On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 04:01:23PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Dec 2003, David Yitzchak Cohen wrote: > > > Oh, whoops ... by the time I attached the file, my debugging setup had > > > already overwritten the file with a new message. This time, I believe > > > I'm attaching the right one. (My email address is also broken in the > > > middle of coloring, I just noticed, BTW.) > > > > Perhaps the ^[[0;;0m confuses the logic - that's redundant, and omits > > a parameter. "^[0m" would be sufficient. > > I assume you meant ^[[0m, and I made the change, just for kicks. > Mutt's pager still screws everything up just the same as before :-( I've now found even more interesting "features" of our pager. A recent mail from another list I'm on had email addys and the GPG stuff all colored either purple or yellow depending on how far I was scrolled down (switching back and forth every couple of lines scrolled). I can bounce the email to anybody who wants to take a look with my config (but based on the almost complete lack of replies to all my previous messages on the topic, I'm guessing nobody really cares much). (Whether I have my original ANSI sequences or the ones proposed above makes no difference whatsoever, BTW.) It's a rather neat visual effect, but I find it very annoying when I'm trying to get useful information quickly by color-coding, to have the colors be less reliable than the elvis syntax-highlighting mode. Perhaps there should be an option like all_your_colorz_are_mine, but it should definitely be set to "no" by default. Thanks again, Thomas, for at least trying, - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpT66CBUpfkJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature