Quoting Bryan Bibb (bryan.bibb@xxxxxxxxxx): > > Just something that I noticed. Are those ^M's really Control-M > > characters, or are they a ^ character followed by a M character? > Hmmm... I just noticed those. I saved a text file containing my PGP > signature from within my sent folder, and then compared it with the > same signature that came back to me (saved from the web in Mozilla, > which thought it was a binary executable). The original one from mutt > was clean in vim, and the one I saved from the server had the ^M > characters (though I didn't see a DOS identification or anything). But... Are they ^ followed by M or Control-M characters? :) If they are ^, M, then that's the cause of your problems, and then you can create a filter that filters out those characters before feeding it to gpg to verify. > 1) where along the path is my mail getting mangled. Only you can find out by asking the people responsible for managing the servers along the path. It would be wise asking only those of hosts that really matter. > Has anyone tried to verify a signed message from me? It works. I don't have your key, but mutt detects the signature and gpg finds valid GPG data. > > If I were you i'd take my mail elsewhere :) > Indeed! Does anyone know of good third-party mail hosting companies? Uhm. No, I don't :| I'm on my own server :) Sander. -- | Aggression comes back to you <-=|=-> you to back comes Aggression | 1024D/08CEC94D - 34B3 3314 B146 E13C 70C8 9BDB D463 7E41 08CE C94D
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature