Re: Attachment problems
- To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Attachment problems
- From: Kumar Appaiah <a.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:37:02 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xL4D8wQmM1VLHN+VoVYgAakWZFj8TEfkEVnV1H1sAeQ=; b=QxOqext/i+uGIsZM8KCwMfT1T5fEKShmvJQGoClMoafTm5emmLY6KhH27vMPDET0a9 +5nyZnzVh5MxruFDb4RT/8b3EDKbNA9tFcDTd4Z7aA73wAa1lk6eZyzGsQqi/f+OQIX7 qZf7aA4l6DxQnTInqT9ycXWxi3dBm4EmOvWxA=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=sVl+c7+Ea81c0Jc2oFhpKTP0uLyENP0tl9pi+buZt/kUAS1hHsHP5E/FIeN0ppJ8Yl kTSum0/5H56b1lO7pKujZD7QCcZEX3iRi5URRsDl4RtL701JBR3GV9gz4prJ6tij6+Si W//b3dH8w/n0Az9ynBPHQy0PbS12zAepuinCs=
- In-reply-to: <20090617143110.GG92400@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-post: <mailto:mutt-users@mutt.org>
- List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users"
- References: <a0c4f6270906170659s485444dp62d51032d5a6d859@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090617142854.GF92400@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090617143110.GG92400@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 17 at 09:28 AM, quoth Kyle Wheeler:
> >According to the mutt man page, the usage pattern line you're looking
> >for is this one:
> >
> > mutt [-nx] [-e cmd] [-F file] [-H file] [-i file] [-s subj]
> > [-b addr] [-c addr] [-a file [...] --] addr [...]
> >
> >Essentially, there can be two lists at the end (one of files to attach
> >and the other of addresses, and they must be separated by a
> >double-hyphen. In other words, your command should be rewritten:
> >
> > mutt -s "Documents you required" -a file1 file2 file3 --
> > myfriend@somewhere
> >
> >Make sense?
>
> If you're wondering "why on earth would they do that?!?" here's the
> answer:
>
> mutt -s "Documents you required" -a file* -- myfriend@somewhere
>
> The change allows you to use shell wildcards to match multiple
> filenames.
I now see the change. I've often wanted this behaviour (which seems
more intuitive), but got used to the former... and my resistance to
change got the better of me; the sudden change put me off for a while.
Thanks for the clarification, and I'll read the man page more carefully. :-)
Kumar
--
Kumar