<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: handling very large mailboxes



Hum.

Maybe my IMAP server is kinda slow then?

I could try tying mutt to my Gmail account to see what happens.

Here's what I have in my .muttrc file (for caching):

  set header_cache="~/.mutt/cache/headers"
  set message_cachedir="~/.mutt/cache/messages"

There seem to be files in there, so I imagine that the caching is
working correctly.

I just ran a tcpdump and worked on mutt for a bit and here's what I'm noticing:

- loading a mailbox the first time around takes a bit of time and
results in some reasonable level of traffic to / from the mail server
- once a mailbox is loaded, the index for that mailbox seems to work smoothly
- loading a single message in that mailbox then takes a few seconds (~5?)

I haven't compared to see what happens when I turn off caching, though.

Bill, are you saying that after the initial 30 second process for your
Gmail, everything loads up instantly (specific email messages, etc.)
afterwards?

-j

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 10:32 AM, bill lam <cbill.lam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 31 May 2009, James wrote:
>> By large I'm talking about, uhhh, ~7000 emails. More or less.
>
> My imap account in gmail have over 30000 message, and also a local
> maildir mailbox for rss having over 80000 message. They need about 10
> to 30 seconds to initial cache checking.
>
> FYI
>
> --
> regards,
> ====================================================
> GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
> gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
> 唐詩259 盧綸  塞下曲四首之四
>    野幕蔽瓊筵  羌戎賀勞旋  醉和金甲舞  雷鼓動山川
>