Re: hook syntax (was: Multiple accounts (using Gmail))
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 12:57:45PM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> reply-hook . \
> 'set signature=~/.standardsig.txt'
>
> reply-hook '~e owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx' \
> 'set signature=~/.muttsig.txt'
>
> Yes, you *can* embed reply-hooks in folder-hooks, but then things get
> ugly because you'd need to unhook things (the unhook is there to
> prevent mutt from building up absurdly long chains of redundant
> hooks), which interacts badly with any other reply-hooks you happen to
> have (i.e. they'd need to be re-established within the folder-hook
> too):
>
> folder-hook . \
> 'unhook reply-hook ; \
> reply-hook . "set signature=stdsig.txt"; \
> reply-hook "~C me@gmail" "set signature=gmailsig.txt"'
>
> folder-hook =lists.mutt \
> 'unhook reply-hook ; \
> set signature=muttsig.txt'
>
> Does that make sense?
Yes, I think so. I'll simply change my folder-hook to be a send-hook
and place it after my other send-hook lines.
Thank you very much for explaining all of that.
--
Bill Moseley.
moseley@xxxxxxxx
Sent from my iMutt