Re: Different encodings at index and pager views
- To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Different encodings at index and pager views
- From: Kyle Wheeler <kyle-mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:06:52 -0600
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=memoryhole.net; h=date :from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; s=default; bh=Vwv7wy0w1KVXmZ4/T4J+M2LvV9c=; b=GdZm V/czDH3gyv7FBng9baYZG256syIxzkFeHQEfxk2E2m6NbCIqp0yk35eAhQ1euK63 mcsnROJgKrQv1cljIASzDgMM6BjTysPuDxvX+ZaMvn4xHkdInX0L0lYeIZoZI7FA t1D4AxdMCWVEDTOoDNAPJ9pmKzcwstjfuBeHPqc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=memoryhole.net; b=TLeKphYn93Zj9CSHSbANfkUgxIyLxKX2Nwo3U5AlVqAsNQsvkOL3qu8DZnkLUKJ+oCTFiAEYms5o3jVbL5CZHP/luWBKSK77f6J6nuTvNbmBeS49dCUFrWJOGucL97e5z95aPbXpGcE0GAQIp8X6Zy2n1vYs281Q0ClYtXQG0M8=; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:OpenPGP:User-Agent;
- In-reply-to: <20090227040740.GA17923@carlos>
- List-post: <mailto:mutt-users@mutt.org>
- List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users"
- Mail-followup-to: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Openpgp: id=CA8E235E; url=http://www.memoryhole.net/~kyle/kyle-pgp.asc; preference=signencrypt
- References: <20090226220720.GA12471@carlos> <20090226235000.GA25725@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090227035008.GA3685@carlos> <20090227040740.GA17923@carlos>
- Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-27)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, February 27 at 02:07 AM, quoth Carlos Pita:
> Yeah, you're right, they're poorly reencoding at some point. Why
> would they do that?
Mmmm probably because they store the message in a database, rather
than a text file.
> Does IMAP impose any restriction on the encoding?
Yes and no. Generally it's limited to 7-bit ASCII, but 8-bit textual
and binary messages are supported via MIME-IMB encoding (whatever that
is). See RFC 3501 section 4.3.1 for details.
> OTOH, they serve the entire mail in its original encoding and so
> they show it at their site.
That's why it's a bug! :)
~Kyle
- --
If Mr. Einstein doesn't like the natural laws of the universe, let him
go back to where he came from.
-- Robert Benchley (1889-1945)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Thank you for using encryption!
iEYEARECAAYFAkmndOwACgkQBkIOoMqOI14pBgCdET60zyrgn+JnU3mylmNGXi1F
QewAoNwh2k9Twlso0jVbCf4gpnFXahqx
=pWmG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----