Re: Different encodings at index and pager views
- To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Different encodings at index and pager views
- From: Carlos Pita <carlosjosepita@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:50:08 -0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=LSmlvqUBkE0rGcFC6mdV0sbDhNBVATGQ9Qr0dDNNtIU=; b=nuIG/LE0ocpbzwslrgP93qgbLFzr+pRvtftINuJEX+tcuzkoyG7uI4JQ5i2YzDdCiI 3uRYJIxcVdS37c3xfZRxp9uzKSl8BDX5g8GwFzInbxLwl8qCftqrnG2DVC2HrChbTzX2 gGqal9VyQCgcu3k7o9J+s6Q/vPCiILYiLqBhY=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=HwP20topB6X8KSvg5c/w03JXVvREDTwSdzwwRTKgrb/H6JAfHzwcoEeewQpy/ubOiG RNW8IN/DP83hnkQctIHhdNuM1hKUvByYWNolTEpX3hnCAfPLYG+KY31R8xXtthaBhh5q OVs2r8Eiht+w8XP+07f0defhtNT1vj0XaKZyk=
- In-reply-to: <20090226235000.GA25725@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-post: <mailto:mutt-users@mutt.org>
- List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users"
- References: <20090226220720.GA12471@carlos> <20090226235000.GA25725@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
Hi Kyle,
> You're not *forcing* the charset, you're *guessing* the charset.
> There's a semantic difference (of course, we computer folk love to
I didn't mean I was forcing the charset to be one that it wasn't, of
course, but telling mutt to interpret the binary data as having one or
another encoding.
> > * I made some tests with my locale configured to en_US.ISO-8859-1
> > and then to en_US.UTF-8.
>
> I presume your terminal is capable of understanding UTF-8 characters?
Yes it is. I'm using urxvt. I did the same thing viewing the raw mail in
my browser and changing its enconding, anyway.
> Maybe not, but generally speaking, it's a very VERY bad idea to set
> the $charset manually (unless you really know what you're doing - I
Sure. I did it with the only purpose of testing different scenarios.
> Anyway - step 1 is to find out *exactly* what the conversation between
> mutt and gmail looks like.
I'm on it.
Thanks for your reply, I'll post the results later.
Regards
-Carlos