Re: Clarification on tag-prefix-cond vs. tag-prefix
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:20 +0100, "Jan-Herbert Damm" <jan-h-damm@xxxxxx>
wrote:
> Kyle Wheeler:
> >... However, because I use
> > <tag-prefix-cond>, when there aren't any tagged messages (i.e. the
> > pattern "~r >3m" didn't match anything), mutt will stop processing
> > that hook and none of the rest of it will happen.
> >
> > Does that make sense?
> yes it does! thank you so much for posting this help on archiving. i
> learned
> a lot from reviewing it very slowly.
>
> if you don't mind, can you explain the pattern "~r >3m" equally well? i
> know i
> could figure it out by RTFM but it would take forever.
>
in less than 1 minute - from TFM:
~r MIN-MAX messages with "date-received" in a Date range
>3m greater than 3 months.