Re: red background warning in .muttrc
- To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: red background warning in .muttrc
- From: Kyle Wheeler <kyle-mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:30:16 -0600
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=memoryhole.net; h=date :from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; s=default; bh=Z9xasRmOW5q/LFq7jjVXAf0Roac=; b=ApNg 4c/+3T1oV5eUJtogu8T+wT2oOyg2x/Z+Q0PL2ft9IsqlwN8v+H4NvzBQl7C6Vf6M Sx+QZayCm1GSSyTcK9XzrCqu94P+RHK4DS+xyl3LQ+q4y2mALpjB6IwaGVNoTmDP +lkaLeAK6SInFjW6MGCe1ZCVh8xtvCppqQgzVB4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=memoryhole.net; b=EaMaM7X/lS/146vfMSAdDscuN2/X/WUDwaMy0NW5KgQCr60949THqTMpSQDEcWU/Fr+izD85bgXzuwuAc/DEVmZ2/aAsSf46ZwF1R9PvgnwaqOB8Ltw3H9N4IWDZiYEgka/aXZUcFouMH6xyF3ITUBLP0YyEFz1jzb+jQ0gpdi8=; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:OpenPGP:User-Agent;
- In-reply-to: <20081212200606.GB12034@xxxxxxxxx>
- List-post: <mailto:mutt-users@mutt.org>
- List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users"
- Mail-followup-to: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Openpgp: id=CA8E235E; url=http://www.memoryhole.net/~kyle/kyle-pgp.asc; preference=signencrypt
- References: <20081212200606.GB12034@xxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-11-30)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, December 12 at 03:06 PM, quoth rj:
> The following color definition in my .muttrc does what I want it to, but
> the ">15k" part of "~z>15k" is highlighted with a bright red background,
> which I believe is indicating to me that the way I have it written isn't
> quite correct.
This is probably something you want to take up with me - I'm the
maintainer of the muttrc colorings for vim. It looks like you've
definitely found a bug! I've been enforcing mandatory space between ~z
and its arguments, and that's unnecessary. It also looks like you can
append things like 'k' to the end of a size spec (which makes sense),
which is appears to be completely undocumented (am I wrong?). Do you
know what all the accepted suffixes are? I assuming k and M... are
there others?
> I tried various quotings and spacings but couldn't get rid of the
> red. Is it written correctly? If not, thanks for any tips on what
> I might need to do.
If mutt accepts it, then it's probably written correctly. The
highlighting is supposed to match what mutt accepts, but... hey, we
all make mistakes.
~Kyle
- --
I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work.
-- Thomas Edison
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Thank you for using encryption!
iEYEARECAAYFAklCydgACgkQBkIOoMqOI17SlwCfVomZFs1+VzshZsa/EWCqcMJK
ghkAninE/J2Fz9p/1seof6JIHWe6Kqra
=wqlW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----