<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: save-message to ? and then sync the folder



* Chris Bannister <mockingbird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [12-05-08 07:45]:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 05:40:58PM -0600, David Champion wrote:
> > * On 2008.11.27, in <20081127132013.GA17151@dracona>,
> > *   "trance202@xxxxxx" <trance202@xxxxxx> wrote: 
>                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> Have you got a "%D" in your set attribution="On ... wrote:"?

he probably does not as that in mutt would not accomplish what you
describe.  Look at "man muttrc" and you will find, %n <%a>

> On some lists you can get flamed for including the email address in the
> attribution, (or anywhere in the body, I presume.), ... something about
> "address havesters". It was interesting to note that the list(s)
> mentioned had windoze users as subscribers, i.e. vim_use and a cygwin
> list.

What makes it easier to get the addresses from the body than from the
header?  They appear both places.

> I notice the mutt default setting for the attribution doesn't include
> the email address (%D?).

  :^)
  
-- 
Patrick Shanahan         Plainfield, Indiana, USA        HOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.org     Photo Album:  http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535                    @ http://counter.li.org