Re: save-message to ? and then sync the folder
* Chris Bannister <mockingbird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [12-05-08 07:45]:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 05:40:58PM -0600, David Champion wrote:
> > * On 2008.11.27, in <20081127132013.GA17151@dracona>,
> > * "trance202@xxxxxx" <trance202@xxxxxx> wrote:
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Have you got a "%D" in your set attribution="On ... wrote:"?
he probably does not as that in mutt would not accomplish what you
describe. Look at "man muttrc" and you will find, %n <%a>
> On some lists you can get flamed for including the email address in the
> attribution, (or anywhere in the body, I presume.), ... something about
> "address havesters". It was interesting to note that the list(s)
> mentioned had windoze users as subscribers, i.e. vim_use and a cygwin
> list.
What makes it easier to get the addresses from the body than from the
header? They appear both places.
> I notice the mutt default setting for the attribution doesn't include
> the email address (%D?).
:^)
--
Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org