Re: fork process on reply
Gary Johnson wrote: [Fri Nov 21 2008, 05:28:54PM EST]
> Interesting. What do you about setting the 'r' flag for
> messages to which you've replied?
I don't presently.
> I played with a scheme similar to yours for a while, but
> I didn't like that there was no way to automatically and
> reliably set the 'r' flag according to whether or not
> I actually replied to a message.
Yeah, I think the best you can do is <set-flag>r in the reply
macros, and assume you always finish what you start. ;-)
Aron