Re: sendmail_wait for smtp ?
* Wilkinson, Alex <alex.wilkinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [05-18-2008]:
> 0n Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:01:38PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
>
> >Yes and no. Mutt is not multithreaded, so you can't have it handle the
> >SMTP connection in the background, so, NO. But if you really want it
> >backgrounded, why not use a simple SMTP sender (like msmtp or
> >nullmailer or something similar) instead of have mutt do it? That way
> >you *can* background email sending.
>
> Is msmtp completely independent of a local MTA ? i.e. I would no longer need
> to use my local sendmail for smart-relay anymore ?
Correct.
--
Sahil Tandon <sahil@xxxxxxxxxx>