Re: sendmail_wait for smtp ?
- To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: sendmail_wait for smtp ?
- From: Kyle Wheeler <kyle-mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 12:01:38 -0500
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=memoryhole.net; h=date :from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; s=default; bh=rYBH1wKaWBu3x/s/MUJK3/1MrPY=; b=RVJd UwGZpFatPTuO4DVK1kKAurovaEhyFelBlf+H/7dlYsmCdZxvWiieYW9sNoeaYj0M T2xJr8/Lv1Bg7QbofreY/MvncDSYHGP8bzYI5JuS1XsdWSj5u6kRNQY7gd4rjkXG 0Th69NODhGFkEQ1mrPeVxgzXKC5gXXXP+XtLH6k=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=memoryhole.net; b=JrAdQanm0oCq+vNIRA9L0tAtbUoEb3qff8XVuXa9UudP1awiIfRHgEYzkvLSTP5cEuHg1VmyEaXirM/nGmwJewFw/mxfdJZQsqh4uh55GGThm0fic13G+OttbSnHVh6zrjnwpBUfFE1c/zr5E4uxggI0nnpT/gdIfAjhp84hAFY=; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:OpenPGP:User-Agent;
- In-reply-to: <20080517045339.GC6636@xxxxxxxxxx>
- List-post: <mailto:mutt-users@mutt.org>
- List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users"
- Mail-followup-to: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Openpgp: id=CA8E235E; url=http://www.memoryhole.net/~kyle/kyle-pgp.asc; preference=signencrypt
- References: <20080517045339.GC6636@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, May 17 at 04:53 PM, quoth Dylan Stamat:
>When sending an email through a remote smtp server, the status bar goes
>through it's sending process, like:
>
>Sending...
>Looking up etc...
>Connecting etc...
>SSL/TLS etc...
>Authenticating LOGIN etc...
>
>Is there any way to background this ? Something like sendmail_wait=-1,
>but for smtp ? Waiting for mail to send can be time consuming.
Yes and no. Mutt is not multithreaded, so you can't have it handle the
SMTP connection in the background, so, NO. But if you really want it
backgrounded, why not use a simple SMTP sender (like msmtp or
nullmailer or something similar) instead of have mutt do it? That way
you *can* background email sending.
~Kyle
- --
Preach the Gospel at all times and when necessary use words.
-- St. Francis of Assisi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Thank you for using encryption!
iEYEARECAAYFAkgvD3IACgkQBkIOoMqOI17H4wCfW52pIXb8gA8h+1pnwkt5MhKj
twAAn0Gg2c+hfdT5Xx2UAU/cEZGlRL9w
=CR3o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----