Re: copy on a per email basis
- To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: copy on a per email basis
- From: Kyle Wheeler <kyle-mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:36:13 -0600
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=memoryhole.net; h=date: from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; q=dns/txt; s=default; bh= /f07XepY2+T2L7Y3OC3E/bko1Xo=; b=S+CH0kXnCVL72J2kpx/gBvmp3V6cHzLm vv1zFXkAQzJP3Nw0Dyh6+SiCaJi8IDJI1y6fKGXEjXBblDhTTbghQHjyNESLndtv T4Ps4ShhuEVLKHNfwdtJb4R6ZIahHMXXSAwVk7vTW/nQFXo6yzRCpVxnsdODMdoj ssklSnZk/k0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=memoryhole.net; b=cidKwF7j2c69bigc9BncM0NdzMCJpqxa4RXD58HmbGP9/PZZJCQXvRzIiwswJt8zBsDW2YoKYHDio70QBogEQoyTW3BQCJoSJM/WYRpQehH62l6PfSPRE04kNuTNhbasQrpZW2Z0DZJYLEYbMt01XduU8LBueLY0nMP0OHZn7kw=; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:OpenPGP:User-Agent;
- In-reply-to: <20080216213252.GA27594@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-post: <mailto:mutt-users@mutt.org>
- List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users"
- Mail-followup-to: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Openpgp: id=CA8E235E; url=http://www.memoryhole.net/~kyle/kyle-pgp.asc; preference=signencrypt
- References: <6ca73f650802121010h39f2f3fas65d626f319477c95@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080212184420.GA2383@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080216213252.GA27594@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-01-14)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, February 16 at 10:32 PM, quoth Peter Münster:
> On Tue, Feb 12 2008, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
>> the effort of writing it to /dev/null. Unfortunately, you can't use
>> fcc-hook to specify "nothing". For example, this won't work:
>>
>> fcc-hook ~u ""
>>
>> I'm not sure why.
>
> Hello Kyle,
>
> Shouldn't this be considered as a bug, and /dev/null just an ugly
> work-around?
<shrug> I think the mutt developers would probably say "if you didn't
want it writing the FCC, you should use a send-hook to set $copy=no"
(in other words "that's not what fcc-hooks are supposed to be used
for").
~Kyle
- --
I see the pain on your face when you say the word intellectual,
because it has so many syllables in it.
-- Clive James
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Thank you for using encryption!
iD8DBQFHt4F9BkIOoMqOI14RAhNTAKDnER8+iQQaqc0+eyjvlRwXOVwnhgCfeL6o
txEtBjbyQBd/7AfzeBF/LaM=
=1lZv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----