also sprach Kyle Wheeler <kyle-mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2007.10.10.1245 +0100]:
> current next
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> !O & !N N <--- This is the crucial difference, right?
Almost, but yes. My argument is that this behaviour should depend on
$mark_old. If that's set, the result should be O; otherwise N.
> N !O & !N
> O !O & !N
This is also a difference. Pressing N on an O message makes it N.
That may be okay, but if $mark_old is set, I'd say it should rather
clear the O flag (and set !O & !N).
Sorry for not making myself clear in the first place.
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck
"women who want to be equal to men lack ambition."
-- timothy leary
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@xxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)