<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: Fwd: Re: alias list and bcc



On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 07:24:43AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> Please explain "to-field isn't correct" and site rfc's supporting your
> "supposition".
> 
"Correct" was not quite the right word. What I wanted to say is, that
the to-field ideally should present the address of the recipient an not
"undisclosed recipient" even if this is conform to rfc #idunno.

> > Maybe someone shows up with a clean solution.
> 
> You have been offered several.  Perhaps you should do some
> investigation to educate yourself rather than placing the onus on
> "someone".  The provided mutt documentation is *very* good.

I'm sorry. That was not meant to be an insult. I am not a native speaker
of English and was not aware of the subtle meaning of "someone". 

-- 
Benjamin Eckenfels

OpenPGP
Key id: CF56E489
Key fingerprint = 386D CBE1 0833 4C12 2871  F51E 839D 18EF CF56 E489
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCF56E489

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature