Hi Kirill,
* Kirill Miazine <km@xxxxxxxx> [17-07-2007 14:31]:
>>> Do you use the %() format in your attribution?
>>>
>>> %(fmt) the local date and time when the message was received.
>>> ``fmt'' is expanded by the library function ``strftime'';
>>> a leading bang disables locales
>>>
>>> Try %{}.
>>
>> This doesn't really help -- my question pertains to the date the
>> message was sent (this is how I interpret the Date:) header.
>
> I suppose I did answer your question, which was why your attribution
> uses the timestamp on which the message was received, rather than the
> timestamp in the Date: header of the message.
>
> The value in the Date: header is set by the sender (the %{} format) and
> it's different from the time at which the message was received (the %()
> format). So I asked if you were using the %() format in your
> attribution.
>
> Show us what you have in your "attribution". You seem to have modified
> the default.
You were absolutely right -- I didn't notice the difference since some
send-hook kicked in when I was doing some tests. And I didn't
interpret the documentation correctly. Now it's working fine.
Thanks for bearing with me ;-)
Bye,
--
René Clerc - (rene@xxxxxxxx) - PGP: 0x9ACE0AC7
Like a blind man in an orgy, I was going to have to feel my way through.
-Frank Drebin, "Naked Gun 33 1/3: The Final Insult"
Attachment:
pgpyQSU511kEK.pgp
Description: PGP signature