Hi Kirill, * Kirill Miazine <km@xxxxxxxx> [17-07-2007 14:31]: >>> Do you use the %() format in your attribution? >>> >>> %(fmt) the local date and time when the message was received. >>> ``fmt'' is expanded by the library function ``strftime''; >>> a leading bang disables locales >>> >>> Try %{}. >> >> This doesn't really help -- my question pertains to the date the >> message was sent (this is how I interpret the Date:) header. > > I suppose I did answer your question, which was why your attribution > uses the timestamp on which the message was received, rather than the > timestamp in the Date: header of the message. > > The value in the Date: header is set by the sender (the %{} format) and > it's different from the time at which the message was received (the %() > format). So I asked if you were using the %() format in your > attribution. > > Show us what you have in your "attribution". You seem to have modified > the default. You were absolutely right -- I didn't notice the difference since some send-hook kicked in when I was doing some tests. And I didn't interpret the documentation correctly. Now it's working fine. Thanks for bearing with me ;-) Bye, -- René Clerc - (rene@xxxxxxxx) - PGP: 0x9ACE0AC7 Like a blind man in an orgy, I was going to have to feel my way through. -Frank Drebin, "Naked Gun 33 1/3: The Final Insult"
Attachment:
pgpyQSU511kEK.pgp
Description: PGP signature