Re: [t-prot] display_filter not getting exec()'d ...

["Wilkinson, Alex" <alex.wilkinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

    0n Sun, May 06, 2007 at 08:38:43AM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote: 

    >On Sunday, May  6 at 08:44 PM, quoth Wilkinson, Alex:
    >> I'm not sure if this is the best way to test from the CLI,
    >
    >It is.
    >
    >> but as you can see t-prot doesn't seem to alter the message at all. 
    >
    >Aha! Well, there you have it; not a mutt config problem, but a t-prot 
    >config problem.
    >
    >> This was a fake message a created for testing:
    >>
    >>    #cat /var/tmp/test.txt | /usr/local/bin/t-prot -acelmtS -Mmutt --spass
    >
    >I use t-prot like this: t-prot -cemtwk -M=mutt
    >
    >Things I observe about how you're using t-prot:
    >
    >     - You're using -a, but you're not using -A, which t-prot requires 
    >       (see its documentation)
    >     - You're using -l, but you're not using -L, which t-prot requires 
    >       (see its documentation)

Yup, you're right. t-prot is actually doing something.

I have changed my t-prot settings to:

set display_filter='/usr/local/bin/t-prot -cemtwkS -M=mutt --spass"

And all is now good.

 -aW

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence 
Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES ACT 
1914.  If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact 
the sender and delete the email.