<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: Is merging threads possible?



On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 12:21:33PM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
> * Chris G <cl@xxxxxxxx> [04-04-2007 11:43]:
> 
> > On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 11:26:08AM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
> > > * Chris G <cl@xxxxxxxx> [04-04-2007 11:18]:
> > > 
> > > > I often find threads get split (especially at work) and/or two threads
> > > > are actually about the same subject.  Is it possible to merge threads
> > > > in mutt?
> > > 
> > > It's called the linking of threads, and in mutt this is done by
> > > tagging the message, moving to the new parent, and (by default), press
> > > '&' to link the threads.  In addition, a '#' (again, by default)
> > > breaks a thread at that point.
> > > 
> > Thank you, is this a new facility in 1.5.x?  I have a default Fedora
> > Core 6 installation with mutt 1.4.2.2i at present.  I'm quite happy
> > (and able) to upgrade mutt and this might well give me a good excuse
> > to do it!
> 
> The edit-thread patch was applied to the 1.5 branch a while a go.  It
> is definately not present in an unpatched 1.4.  You should indeed
> upgrade to a recent 1.5, I guess, since there has been much
> development and improvement lately.
> 
All done, isn't building/installing on Linux easy!  :-)   (Previously
my work desktop machine was Solaris, much more pain!).

It's really a pity that mutt 'stable' is so old now, it's what gets
delivered on most distributions and means that people trying mutt
won't get to see all the new goodies.

I got 1.4.2.2 on the following:-
    Slackware 11 (home machine)
    Fedora Core 6 (work desktop machine)

... and 1.4.1i on a BSD machine (this one) which is my main mail
reading location.

-- 
Chris Green