Re: formail help (Re: Making own threads in mutt.)
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 01:16:22PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Charlie Allom <charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [11-19-06 12:34]:
> > but formail seems like the right tool. Can someone else chime in here?
>
> It appears that he wants to thread msgs who's subject has been altered
> that contain no message_id or in_reply_to headers. I see NO logic to
> accomplish this. Even if you used procmail/formail, you would have to
> select the relevant msgs by hand as no consistent basis is available to
> construct a recipe, ie: missing headers (msg_id & in_rply_to) and
> unlike subjects.
but Subject is always (Re:) [0-9]{n}, no?
so insert a In-Reply-To: $MATCH - no?
--
hail eris
http://rubberduck.com/