<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: formail help (Re: Making own threads in mutt.)



On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 01:16:22PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Charlie Allom <charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [11-19-06 12:34]:
> > but formail seems like the right tool. Can someone else chime in here?
> 
> It appears that he wants to thread msgs who's subject has been altered
> that contain no message_id or in_reply_to headers.  I see NO logic to
> accomplish this.  Even if you used procmail/formail, you would have to
> select the relevant msgs by hand as no consistent basis is available to
> construct a recipe, ie: missing headers (msg_id & in_rply_to) and
> unlike subjects.

but Subject is always (Re:) [0-9]{n}, no?

so insert a In-Reply-To: $MATCH - no?

-- 
 hail eris
 http://rubberduck.com/