* Rado S <rado@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [060602 15:29]: > [=- markus reichelt wrote on Thu 1.Jun'06 at 23:06:54 +0200 -=] > > You make it appear obligatory to hit the wiki for those users who > > have taken part in this discussion. > > Yes, it is. Otherwise just say "yes"/"no" and save the bandwidth > and the time to read your noise. 1. The wiki isn't, and has never been, a formal part of mutt's development community. 2. A mailing list is a better forum for debate than a wiki. 3. Mutt development isn't democratic, and it's certainly not the case that you just need to assemble some majority vote to get some changes implemented. Provide a reasoned argument and convince the maintainers that the changes should be made (notice I don't say "shout" or "reiterate your points" but "convince" - i.e., respond to rebuttals) and they will be implemented. If you don't want to work through accepted channels, fork the thing. Perhaps you'll have more success than mutt-ng. j
Attachment:
pgpVEZR6IQukV.pgp
Description: PGP signature