<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: fcc-hook oddness



Re: Kyle Wheeler in <20041012003534.GA9125@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > What about "send-hook ~l 'unset record'"?
> 
> Unless I'm wrong (and hey, if I am, great!), that goes a little too far, 
> because it unsets the record in general, requiring a "send-hook . 
> record=blah" kind of command, where I'm unsure how it interacts with 
> other fcc- and fcc-save-hooks. What is the precedence of that sort of 
> thing?

Uhm, that should have been 'unset copy'... (And as Patrick pointed
out, you'll need a default send-hook to reset it for other messages.)

Christoph
-- 
cb@xxxxxxxx | http://www.df7cb.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature