Re: fcc-hook oddness
* Kyle Wheeler <kyle-mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [10-11-04 19:36]:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 05:13:04AM +0000, Christoph Berg quoth:
> > What about "send-hook ~l 'unset record'"?
>
> Unless I'm wrong (and hey, if I am, great!), that goes a little too
> far, because it unsets the record in general, requiring a "send-hook .
> record=blah" kind of command, where I'm unsure how it interacts with
> other fcc- and fcc-save-hooks. What is the precedence of that sort of
> thing?
Set a default send-hook *first* and it will be observed unless the
second (or third ...) matches the condition, ~l.
--
Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535
http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org
HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/photos