so spake Vlad Ghitulescu [2004.05.04 @ 15:35]: > * Laas Toom <laas.toom@xxxxxxxx> [2004-05-04 19:32]: > > > > hi, > Hi! yo! > > But this is most definitely the wrong approach, so do not use it ;) > I hope, it is not so foolish to ask: why is it so wrong to want to sent > all the mails at once, whitout to re-open each of them? there ain't nothin wrong....with a little bump n grind.... ahem. sorry. there ain't nothing wrong with wanting to send a bunch of emails at once. there *is* something wrong with wanting mutt to do that for you. it's a subtle difference, but one that most of us wankers will staunchly defend. =) like people have alluded to before, mutt is an MUA; that means Mail User Agent (not Mutt User Agent, like I just wrote on accident). it's for U, the user. things like sendmail, postfix, and the like, are MTA's, Message Transport Agents|Mail Transfer Agents. they're for the T; T is for sending. =) a lot of smtp speaking relay only MTA's support queuing of mail that will be sent all at once, which will do exactly what you want, *and* preserve the sanctity of the sacred job of an MUA. ;) search the archives for threads that will point you to a bunch of these relay only MTA's[1]. [1] man, i'm nice today... http://groups.google.com/groups?th=f9c65a9804c5591e > > > Laas > Vlad peace, -- *------------------------* // ste\/e || 0x44288D05 // *------------------------*
Attachment:
pgpMEDDlWQufS.pgp
Description: PGP signature