Re: Auto clearsign with gpg

To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Auto clearsign with gpg
From: Hendrik Mangels <mangels@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:57:56 +0200
In-reply-to: <20040427095030.GA60603@skippy>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-users-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
References: <20040427080909.GB53125@skippy> <20040427085853.GM8028@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040427095030.GA60603@skippy>
Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i

Zbynek Houska (2004-04-27, 11:50):
> > The use of this format is strongly deprecated, please use
> > PGP/Mime.
> Oh, I didn't noticed it... Is there any explanation about pros and cons?

http://www.mutt.org/doc/PGP-Notes.txt

HTH,
Hendrik

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Auto clearsign with gpg
  - From: Zbynek Houska

References:
- Auto clearsign with gpg
  - From: Zbynek Houska
- Re: Auto clearsign with gpg
  - From: Hendrik Mangels
- Re: Auto clearsign with gpg
  - From: Zbynek Houska

Prev by Date: Re: Auto clearsign with gpg
Next by Date: Re: Auto clearsign with gpg
Previous by thread: Re: Auto clearsign with gpg
Next by thread: Re: Auto clearsign with gpg
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread