On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 07:54:00PM EDT, Til Schubbe wrote: > * On 10.04. Christoph Berg (cb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) muttered: > > can't you just tell that person that his Reply-To: > > header sucks and get him to use a proper one? People tend to have a > > reason for using that header. > > The reason is that he often uses another (his girlfriend's?) > computer. He says, he doesn't care to which account I reply. But I > do, because his girlfriend's name/account is irrelevant to me and > I'd like to find my outgoing mails by egreping for his realname. May I suggest Reply-To: (or maybe even From:) mangling with procmail(1) or equivalent? - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpanxIYEkq63.pgp
Description: PGP signature