<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: Change To:-header when replying



On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 07:54:00PM EDT, Til Schubbe wrote:
> * On 10.04. Christoph Berg (cb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) muttered:

> > can't you just tell that person that his Reply-To:
> > header sucks and get him to use a proper one? People tend to have a
> > reason for using that header.
> 
> The reason is that he often uses another (his girlfriend's?)
> computer. He says, he doesn't care to which account I reply. But I
> do, because his girlfriend's name/account is irrelevant to me and
> I'd like to find my outgoing mails by egreping for his realname.

May I suggest Reply-To: (or maybe even From:) mangling with procmail(1)
or equivalent?

 - Dave

-- 
Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor?
It's simple, Skyler.  You've seen what food processors do to food, right?

Please visit this link:
http://rotter.net/israel

Attachment: pgpanxIYEkq63.pgp
Description: PGP signature