Re: color issues

To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: color issues
From: dan radom <dan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 08:43:49 -0600
In-reply-to: <20031024123937.GA2965@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-users-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
References: <20031024013747.GA27446@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031024034128.GA50898@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031024045217.GA28366@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031024123937.GA2965@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: dan@xxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

* Christoph Berg (cb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Re: Re: color issues [dan radom <dan@xxxxxxxxx>, Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 
> 10:52:17PM -0600, <20031024045217.GA28366@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
> > hmmm.  My preference would be for "color status black green" to do just
> > that, regardless of the index color for ~N.  The background color for
> > status is honored, so why not foreground?  Am i just thinking about this
> > the wrong way?
> 
> I think you mixed up "status", "normal", and "indicator".

Yes.  I"m talking about indicator here.  not status.  sorry.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: color issues
  - From: Christoph Berg

References:
- color issues
  - From: dan radom
- Re: color issues
  - From: Tweax Daemon
- Re: color issues
  - From: dan radom
- Re: color issues
  - From: Christoph Berg

Prev by Date: RE: Collapse all threads except the one you are on
Next by Date: Re: Collapse all threads except the one you are on
Previous by thread: Re: color issues
Next by thread: Re: color issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread