Hi, On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 11:22:22PM +0900, Derek Martin wrote: > But still, I would not support that argument. I acknowledge and > support the idea that others' use of mutt will differ from mine. I > think that's the whole point of having a powerful, configurable mail > client. ... And that's the whole point of being able to use a common extension language such as Scheme to do so (which I'm working on). ;-) Ludovic.
Attachment:
pgpkRQkMviWOt.pgp
Description: PGP signature