Alex -- ...and then Alex Polite said... % % On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 09:28:18AM -0400, David T-G wrote: % > Alex -- % > % > [Mentioning portions of the original.] % > % > Oh. I get it. Like this, then? :-) % % haha. *grin* % % > Once again, we get back to the point where only a human -- or at least % > a much smarter algorithm than I want to see implemented in mutt -- can % > determine whether or not the message belongs with it's purported % > parent. % % Nope. You're wrong. In real life (!= the one email in history where Oh, I'm almost certain that there's been more than one ;-) % David tried to prove a point by breaking the convention of laziness) it will be % quite easy to amend the traditional threading algorithms. OK. If you can do it, more power to you! % % > If you have any ideas, perhaps you could implement something in procmail % > which breaks the references. As an added bonus, put back together thread % > messages from borken clients like Outhouse :-) % % You know what I just might do that, if only to wipe that smile of your % face :) That's a deal :-) I'd very much love to have it; I suffer on those mailing lists, too. % % alex HAND :-D -- David T-G * There is too much animal courage in (play) davidtg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx * society and not sufficient moral courage. (work) davidtgwork@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Mary Baker Eddy, "Science and Health" http://justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
Attachment:
pgpn61usmsftw.pgp
Description: PGP signature